Tools / Fees and break-even

Crypto Futures Fee & Break-Even Calculator

How far does the price need to move before you make money? Include the cost of opening, holding and closing your position to find the break-even exit.

Find my break-even price

Short answer

Your break-even exit must cover both trading legs and the cost of holding the position. This calculator solves the closing commission at the exit price itself, supports different entry and exit rates, and subtracts rebates or funding receipts. Use a fixed-quantity linear futures position; inverse contracts require different accounting.

Find my break-even exit
Interactive worksheet

Your break-even inputs

No exchange login or API key required

Loading fee worksheet…

Find the exit price that leaves your futures trade flat

Start with the average entry price and the full position value at that price. A 0.1 BTC position entered at $100,000 has $10,000 of exposure. Whether its margin is $1,000 or $2,000 does not change its commission base. Leverage is therefore not a separate input here: multiplying the same position by leverage again would overstate the costs.

Select Planned entry when the entry price is a reference quote and combined slippage should cover entry plus exit. Select Already opened when you enter your actual average fill; the slippage field then covers only the remaining exit. Changing this selector clears the old allowance so that an entry impact already embedded in your fill is not charged twice.

Set the opening and closing rates independently. You might enter with a maker fill and leave with a market order, or close some quantity through a stop that receives taker treatment. The calculator does not assume that choosing a limit order guarantees a maker fill. Use the rate recorded for an executed opening and the plausible rate for the planned closing.

The main result is an exit price, not a recommended take-profit. It answers a narrower question: where does this fixed quantity cover the entered expenses? Profit beyond that threshold still depends on the fill you receive. The price tick field rounds a long exit upward or a short exit downward so rounding does not leave a small modeled loss.

What belongs in the slippage field?

For a planned entry, enter a combined allowance for entry and exit, measured in basis points against the stated reference price. One basis point is 0.01%, or $1 on $10,000. An allowance of 6 bps therefore contributes $6, not $60.

For an existing position, the executed average entry already contains the opening execution effect. Do not add that same effect a second time. Set the remaining slippage budget for the planned exit, or use zero when evaluating two actual fill prices. This distinction often explains why a worksheet appears more expensive than the account history.

A $10,000 trade: why closing fees slightly change the answer

Take a hypothetical BTC long with a $100,000 entry, $10,000 position value, 0.055% commission on each side, a combined 6 bps execution allowance and $3 of net funding paid. These are example inputs, not a quote for every exchange account. Quantity is 0.1 BTC.

Opening commission is $5.50. The slippage allowance is $6 and carry adds $3. Before closing commission, the trade must recover $14.50. Estimating the closing fee at entry adds another $5.50, giving a convenient $20 starting estimate. But the closing position value is slightly higher when the long exits profitably, so its percentage commission rises too.

Solving both together produces an exit of about $100,200.11. The closing commission becomes approximately $5.511, and gross price profit covers the full $20.011 cost. A $0.10 price tick moves the first covering limit price to $100,200.20. The small difference matters when reconciling arithmetic; it is not a promise that execution will be precise to the last cent.

Same position, different execution assumptions
ExampleOpening / closing commissionBreak-even long exit
Both legs at 0.055%0.055% / 0.055%$100,200.11
Opening at 0.020%; closing at 0.055%0.020% / 0.055%$100,165.09
Both legs at 0.020%0.020% / 0.020%$100,130.03

Use the cost breakdown to decide what is worth changing

The waterfall separates opening commission, closing commission, execution allowance, net carry and other costs. Look at the largest contribution before optimizing the smallest. Saving $1 on a maker entry is not an improvement if waiting for that fill leads to an extra $8 of adverse execution or missed quantity.

A commission discount affects only the trading-fee bars. It does not shrink funding automatically. Conversely, a shorter hold can reduce carry without changing either commission rate. Try those alternatives independently and save separate scenarios; otherwise several simultaneous changes can conceal which assumption produced the improvement.

The closing-fee bar uses the solved exit value, while the unchanged-price cost in the numerical results values both legs at entry. Their totals can differ slightly for the reason demonstrated above. If a proposed scenario has no feasible positive exit, the tool withholds the waterfall rather than drawing a misleading commission amount.

Where do withdrawals and gas belong?

Use “Other fixed costs” only for expenses you want this trade to recover. If a $4 transfer funds ten planned trades, charging all $4 to each trade would multiply one real expense into $40. Assign it once or use a deliberate allocation, such as $0.40 per trade.

A withdrawal to your own wallet is not an exchange trading commission. It can still matter to the total cash outcome, especially for a small position, but keeping it separate makes comparisons fair. Tax is not included: its treatment depends on circumstances outside this position model.

An actual fill already contains its entry slippage

Suppose the quote was 100 but your actual average buy was 100.20. Enter 100.20 for an opened position. Adding another 20 bps of entry slippage would count approximately the same disadvantage twice. Keep the actual opening commission, because it is a separate cash charge, and model only the remaining exit impact.

If you instead enter the original quote of 100 for planning, include the expected entry impact in the combined allowance. Both approaches can describe a trade, but mixing their starting points changes what the output means. A carry estimate imported from the funding tool leaves entry blank until you supply the correct contract price.

Funding received and maker rebates can move break-even below entry

A negative opening or closing rate represents a commission rebate. Negative carry represents funding received. Enter each with its sign; do not subtract it from the fee rate or convert a dollar receipt into a percentage without changing the units.

For example, keep the $10,000 position, the two 0.055% commissions and 6 bps execution allowance, but replace the $3 funding payment with a $25 receipt. At an unchanged price, total modeled cost is now −$8. A long can finish slightly below its entry and still be flat after that receipt; the exact solved exit is about $99,919.96. The tool now displays this price instead of hiding it behind a generic “costs covered” message.

That result is useful for reconciling an already received payment. It is much weaker as a prediction of future income. A funding rate can change, and an assumed maker rebate may not apply to a taker exit. Keep earned credits distinct from hoped-for credits when deciding which scenario to rely on.

The long and short equations, without a hidden fixed exit fee

Quantity equals entry position value divided by entry price. For a long, gross trading profit is quantity multiplied by the difference between exit and entry. For a short, reverse that price difference. Closing commission is quantity multiplied by exit price and the closing fee rate.

Let E be entry price, N be entry position value, c be opening commission plus the slippage allowance plus net carry plus other costs, and f be the closing fee expressed as a decimal. The long exit is E × (1 + c/N) ÷ (1 − f). The short exit is E × (1 − c/N) ÷ (1 + f). Enter 0.055 in the percentage field; the calculation converts it to 0.00055 internally.

The short formula can become infeasible if costs consume more than the position could gain as price approaches zero. A zero or negative theoretical price is not an executable target. Decimal arithmetic avoids ordinary binary rounding drift, but it cannot correct an unsuitable contract model or an assumed future rate.

Match this worksheet to the contract before comparing exchanges

This is a linear, fixed-quantity model with costs expressed in a common dollar unit. USDT and USDC are treated at their entered dollar value. It does not model an inverse contract’s coin-denominated profit, collateral depegging, multiple partial exits or a changing quantity after scale-ins.

The optional fee loader supplies a stored regular taker baseline and its review date. It does not connect to an account. Some schedules concern a particular channel or product: an API baseline, institutional tier or promotion is not automatically the retail rate. Manual entry is the appropriate route when those details differ.

The funding calculator can transfer a signed cash amount, position value and direction into this page. Its dated transfer still needs a matching entry price and commissions. A slippage estimate from an order book should be entered as a budget, with the snapshot’s age in mind; visible depth is not a guaranteed fill. These handoffs make assumptions inspectable without turning an estimate into an execution instruction.

Reconcile an executed trade without counting costs twice

For an already closed position, use the weighted average entry and exit from the fills, the actual opening commission and the net funding record. Set estimated slippage to zero when execution is already captured in those prices. If your exchange reports realized P&L before fees, subtract them; if its displayed net P&L already includes fees, do not subtract them again. A mismatch in presentation is different from a mismatch in arithmetic.

Crypto Futures Fee & Break-Even Calculator: questions

Is this a crypto profit calculator?

It solves the price at which modeled net profit is zero. It does not forecast a market price or choose a take-profit. For a desired positive net profit, that target must be added separately to your trade planning.

Why does a short have a different break-even distance?

Its closing value falls as it moves favorably, reducing a percentage closing commission. A profitable long has the opposite effect. The exact equations account for that difference instead of adding a fixed fee to both sides.

Can I enter a maker rebate?

Yes. Enter a negative commission percentage for the relevant leg. Use a rebate actually applicable to your account and market; an unfilled maker order earns nothing.

What price tick should I use?

Use the minimum price increment for the exact contract. Leave it at zero if you do not have that value. The calculator never guesses a tick from the asset name.

Can I use this after a partial close?

Recalculate the remaining quantity and allocate costs intentionally. This single-exit model does not reconstruct the cash flows of several earlier fills automatically.

Sources and researchRules, evidence dates and calculation scope

Break-even equations were derived from linear position profit minus opening commission, exit-valued closing commission and signed cash costs. Examples are hypothetical and independently substituted back into net P&L. Tick rounding is conservative for each direction. No order or account was accessed.

Research reviewed 8 October 2026. Contract inputs retain their individual dates; this page is not a claim that every selected exchange account was tested.